US Foreign Policy in the 19th Century
Professor
Department of Political Science
011C Calvin Hall
meflynn@ksu.edu
2024-08-23
Early Years (1783-1870)
Transitional Period (1870-1945)
Hegemonic Period (1945-Present)
What are the broad contours of US foreign policy over time?
What have been some of the key political and economic divides in each time period?
What elements of US foreign policy are common across time period? What changes substantially?
What constitutes an “empire”?
How do we reconcile the process of US expansion with popular rhetoric about democracy and (more recently) human rights?
How does popular historical memory of these earlier time periods shape views on policy today?
Try to obtain a basic level of descriptive accuracy
Find out if reality matches our basic assumption
Identify, or rule out, potential causal factors
US is territorially much, much smaller
US interactions with other nations were limited
World is a bigger place
US had no alliances with other states until the 20th century
Military was very small
Low defense expenditures
US and global trade were very low through 1970s
Treaty of Paris: September 3, 1783
Officially ends war with Great Britain
Freedom!
Treaty of Paris: September 3, 1783
Officially ends war with Great Britain
Freedom!
But there were new enemies
America still relatively weak
Small population, no military, not economically developed/diversified
Still vulnerable to attack and economic exploitation
Key Conflicts:
Managing relations with major powers
English and Spanish territories in Canada and Florida
Territorial conflicts with Native Americans on frontier
Access to the Mississippi
Access to foreign markets and shipping rights
Washington’s Farewell Address:
The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connexion [sic] as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.
The Nullification Crisis
Tariffs represent one of the biggest sources of conflict in the early US
New tariffs passed in 1828 and 1832
Tariffs affect different segments of the population…differently
Conflict over tariffs for revenue vs tariffs for protection
South Carolina state convention adopts Ordinance of Nullification in 1832
President Jackson threatens to send troops to enforce the tariffs
Texas
Migration of US citizens, slave owners, and slaves into Texas territory
Independent Texas, or annexation?
California
Valuable ports for commerce with Asia
American emigration to California increases over time
British and French claims?
US offered Mexico ~$35 million in cash and debt forgiveness ($800 million + in today’s dollars)
US paid $15 million after war
Cost of war to US: ~$100 million; 13,000+ dead
Cost of war to Mexico: ~25,000 dead; large economic losses
North-South split very deep (slavery, economics, expansion, trade, etc)
In reality, these are all very closely connected
Economic interests of the North and South were fundamentally different
European attitudes are mixed (oppose slavery, but want weak America)
Some British politicians supported the North, but many favored the South in an effort to keep the United States divided
Weakened United States would pose less of a threat to British hegemony
Independent Southern states would change dynamics of international trade in Britain’s favor
US emerges from Civil War as a major power
US economy grows rapidly, surpassing Great Britain somewhere in the 1870s
Policymakers start thinking about the US’ role in the broader world
Attention turns to acquiring overseas territories (i.e. colonies)
The Spanish American War presents the first opportunities for the US to acquire overseas territories
Spain loses; US walks away with the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba (sort of)
Supporters of expansion cite:
Opponents of expansion cite:
United States enters the war in 1917
Initially neutral
German submarine warfare targets American merchant shipping
Sinking of the Lusitania
Stalemate in Europe as war drags on
Consequences of the war:
Treaty of Versailles
Often viewed as unfair/unreasonable
France aimed to punish Germany
Severe reparations imposed on Germany
Industrial resources seized
US Senate rejects Treaty of Versailles Twice
League of Nations:
Viewed as a contrast to previous international orders
Provides for collective security
Emphasizes self-determination
Free trade
Germany recovering from initial economic woes, but hit hard by the depression
Radical political parties benefit from economic crisis
Hitler rises to power in 1933
Germany, Italy, and Japan sign a series of treaties between 1936 and 1937
March 1938 Germany annexes Austria by “request”
September 1938 Germany annexes Sudentenland (part of Czechoslovakia)
September 3, 1939 Germany invades Poland
British and French declare war by day’s end
By July 1940 France falls to Germany forces
Battle of Britain begins in August 1940
Japanese military occupied Manchuria in 1931
Extends control of China through early 1940s
Japanese seeking to secure access to materials like oil and rubber
Expansion brings Japan into conflict with Western powers throughout the Pacific
Resource | Percent |
---|---|
Steel | 40% |
Nickel | 100% |
Aluminum | 60% |
Iron Ore | 85% |
Oil | 80% |
Note: Data obtained from John Keegan. The Second World War. |
US resists-ish steps to mobilize for war
Congress imposes arms embargo on belligerent nations
Congress passes Neutrality Acts 1935-1939
December 7, 1941 Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor naval base